Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPHQ vs VLUE: how they differ

SPHQ and VLUE hold 17% of their weight in the same names, and VLUE returned more over the year.

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPHQ and VLUE hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPHQ and VLUE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPHQVLUE
Cisco Systems, Inc.3.54%4.97%
Applied Materials, Inc.2.80%3.67%
Western Digital Corp.2.15%1.89%
QUALCOMM Inc.2.03%1.80%
Merck & Co., Inc.2.87%1.57%
United Parcel Service, Inc.0.85%0.83%
EOG Resources, Inc.0.70%0.66%
Accenture PLC1.04%0.65%
Newmont Corp.1.22%0.64%
NetApp, Inc.0.32%0.36%
Expedia Group, Inc.0.32%0.51%
Snap-on Inc.0.19%0.25%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPHQOnly in VLUE
Costco Wholesale Corp. 4.82%MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 11.63%
Visa Inc. 4.69%INTEL CORPORATION 9.29%
Apple Inc. 4.51%GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY 3.16%
Mastercard Inc. 4.32%VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2.66%
General Electric Co. 4.16%AT&T INC. 2.53%
Lam Research Corp. 4.10%CITIGROUP INC. 1.94%
Caterpillar Inc. 3.78%BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.88%
Procter & Gamble Co. (The) 3.46%FEDEX CORPORATION 1.69%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

SPHQ and VLUE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoiShares
What it isS&P 500 QualityMSCI USA Value Factor
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+69.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts+51.9 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50099.9%96.9%
Holdings99148

SPHQ in plain words

SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VLUE in plain words

VLUE is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Value Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +69.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 148 positions, with the top ten at 43.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPHQ or VLUE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPHQ returned +17.4% and VLUE returned +69.4%, so VLUE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPHQ or VLUE?
SPHQ charges 0.15% a year and VLUE charges 0.15%, so SPHQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPHQ and VLUE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPHQ and 97% of VLUE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 17% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPHQ against VLUE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPHQ against VLUE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPHQ-VLUE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources