Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPHQ vs VB: how they differ

SPHQ and VB hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and SPHQ returned more over the year.

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPHQ and VB hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPHQ and VB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPHQVB
EMCOR Group, Inc.0.47%0.45%
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.0.28%0.33%
Lennox International Inc.0.22%0.22%
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.0.21%0.26%
Incyte Corp.0.21%0.23%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.0.23%0.20%
Jacobs Solutions Inc.0.19%0.18%
Hubbell Inc.0.28%0.17%
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.0.17%0.27%
Deckers Outdoor Corp.0.16%0.17%
F5, Inc.0.16%0.29%
Leidos Holdings, Inc.0.18%0.16%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPHQOnly in VB
Costco Wholesale Corp. 4.82%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55%
Visa Inc. 4.69%Jabil Inc 0.49%
Apple Inc. 4.51%REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46%
Mastercard Inc. 4.32%Astera Labs Inc 0.45%
General Electric Co. 4.16%Natera Inc 0.45%
Lam Research Corp. 4.10%Twilio Inc 0.38%
Caterpillar Inc. 3.78%NRG Energy Inc 0.38%
Cisco Systems, Inc. 3.54%MKS Instruments Inc 0.37%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

SPHQ and VB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoVanguard
What it isS&P 500 QualitySmall-Cap
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+15.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−2.3 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50099.9%21.7%
Holdings991311

SPHQ in plain words

SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPHQ or VB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPHQ returned +17.4% and VB returned +15.2%, so SPHQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPHQ or VB?
SPHQ charges 0.15% a year and VB charges 0.03%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPHQ and VB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPHQ and 22% of VB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPHQ against VB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPHQ against VB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPHQ-VB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources