Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPHQ vs USMV: how they differ

SPHQ and USMV hold 21% of their weight in the same names, and SPHQ returned more over the year.

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPHQ and USMV hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPHQ and USMV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPHQUSMV
Cisco Systems, Inc.3.54%1.81%
Coca-Cola Co. (The)3.34%1.20%
Newmont Corp.1.22%1.18%
Merck & Co., Inc.2.87%1.18%
Mastercard Inc.4.32%1.15%
TJX Cos., Inc. (The)1.79%1.15%
Procter & Gamble Co. (The)3.46%1.11%
Progressive Corp. (The)1.41%1.07%
Visa Inc.4.69%0.94%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.2.28%0.82%
Apple Inc.4.51%0.82%
Accenture PLC1.04%0.75%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPHQOnly in USMV
General Electric Co. 4.16%NVIDIA CORPORATION 1.64%
Lam Research Corp. 4.10%EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60%
Caterpillar Inc. 3.78%MICROSOFT CORPORATION 1.56%
KLA Corp. 3.27%DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION 1.55%
Western Digital Corp. 2.15%THE SOUTHERN COMPANY 1.53%
Eaton Corp. PLC 1.65%AMPHENOL CORPORATION 1.51%
Trane Technologies PLC 1.30%Chubb Limited 1.50%
3M Co. 1.17%VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 1.49%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

SPHQ and USMV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoiShares
What it isS&P 500 QualityMSCI USA Min Vol Factor
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+6.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−10.9 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50099.9%94.8%
Holdings99170

SPHQ in plain words

SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

USMV in plain words

USMV is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 15.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPHQ or USMV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPHQ returned +17.4% and USMV returned +6.6%, so SPHQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPHQ or USMV?
SPHQ charges 0.15% a year and USMV charges 0.15%, so SPHQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPHQ and USMV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPHQ and 95% of USMV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 21% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPHQ against USMV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPHQ against USMV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPHQ-USMV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources