Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPHQ vs SPYG: how they differ

SPHQ and SPYG hold 17% of their weight in the same names.

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPHQ and SPYG hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPHQ and SPYG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPHQSPYG
Apple Inc.4.51%5.99%
Applied Materials, Inc.2.80%1.62%
Lam Research Corp.4.10%1.53%
Caterpillar Inc.3.78%1.38%
KLA Corp.3.27%1.11%
GE Vernova Inc.3.15%0.89%
Visa Inc.4.69%0.88%
Mastercard Inc.4.32%0.78%
Cisco Systems, Inc.3.54%0.69%
General Electric Co.4.16%0.57%
AppLovin Corp.1.56%0.39%
Coca-Cola Co. (The)3.34%0.37%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPHQOnly in SPYG
Costco Wholesale Corp. 4.82%NVIDIA Corp 13.66%
Procter & Gamble Co. (The) 3.46%Microsoft Corp 7.81%
Merck & Co., Inc. 2.87%Alphabet Inc 5.91%
Western Digital Corp. 2.15%Broadcom Inc 5.04%
QUALCOMM Inc. 2.03%Alphabet Inc 4.71%
Eaton Corp. PLC 1.65%Micron Technology Inc 3.67%
Adobe Inc. 1.45%Meta Platforms Inc 3.49%
Trane Technologies PLC 1.30%Amazon.com Inc 3.48%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

SPHQ and SPYG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
SPYG
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoState Street
What it isS&P 500 QualitySPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+17.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts+0.4 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50099.9%100.0%
Holdings99147

SPHQ in plain words

SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPYG in plain words

SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPHQ or SPYG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPHQ returned +17.4% and SPYG returned +17.9%, so SPYG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPHQ or SPYG?
SPHQ charges 0.15% a year and SPYG charges 0.04%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPHQ and SPYG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPHQ and 100% of SPYG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 17% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPHQ against SPYG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPHQ against SPYG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPHQ-SPYG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources