Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPHQ vs SPYD: how they differ

SPHQ and SPYD hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and SPHQ returned more over the year.

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPHQ and SPYD hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPHQ and SPYD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPHQSPYD
United Parcel Service, Inc.0.85%1.19%
EOG Resources, Inc.0.70%1.44%
Kimberly-Clark Corp.0.40%1.32%
Kenvue Inc.0.32%1.32%
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.0.22%1.29%
Best Buy Co., Inc.0.12%1.37%
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.0.10%1.39%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPHQOnly in SPYD
Costco Wholesale Corp. 4.82%Iron Mountain Inc 1.62%
Visa Inc. 4.69%Franklin Resources Inc 1.57%
Apple Inc. 4.51%CVS Health Corp 1.53%
Mastercard Inc. 4.32%Host Hotels & Resorts Inc 1.53%
General Electric Co. 4.16%Edison International 1.48%
Lam Research Corp. 4.10%Target Corp 1.48%
Caterpillar Inc. 3.78%APA Corp 1.48%
Cisco Systems, Inc. 3.54%Viatris Inc 1.46%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

SPHQ and SPYD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
SPYD
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoState Street
What it isS&P 500 QualitySPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+12.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−4.6 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50099.9%100.0%
Holdings9978

SPHQ in plain words

SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPYD in plain words

SPYD is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 15.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPHQ or SPYD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPHQ returned +17.4% and SPYD returned +12.9%, so SPHQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPHQ or SPYD?
SPHQ charges 0.15% a year and SPYD charges 0.07%, so SPYD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPHQ and SPYD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPHQ and 100% of SPYD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPHQ against SPYD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPHQ against SPYD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPHQ-SPYD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources