Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPHD vs XLC: how they differ

SPHD and XLC hold 9% of their weight in the same names, and SPHD returned more over the year.

Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF and State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPHD and XLC hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPHD and XLC both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPHDXLC
Verizon Communications Inc.3.49%4.15%
AT&T Inc.2.02%4.10%
Comcast Corp.1.60%4.71%
Omnicom Group Inc.1.43%2.51%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPHDOnly in XLC
Altria Group, Inc. 3.45%Meta Platforms Inc 19.93%
Healthpeak Properties, Inc. 3.24%Alphabet Inc 13.10%
Kraft Heinz Co. (The) 3.03%Alphabet Inc 10.44%
Pfizer Inc. 2.99%Take-Two Interactive Software Inc 5.26%
Franklin Resources, Inc. 2.82%Netflix Inc 4.84%
VICI Properties Inc. 2.68%Warner Bros Discovery Inc 4.67%
ONEOK, Inc. 2.66%Electronic Arts Inc 4.64%
Kimco Realty Corp. 2.46%Walt Disney Co/The 4.49%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SPHD and XLC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
XLC
State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoState Street
What it isS&P 500 High Dividend Low VolatilityCommunication services
Total return, 1 year+8.6%−2.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−8.9 pts−19.5 pts
Expense ratio0.30%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50095.7%100.0%
Holdings4923

SPHD in plain words

SPHD is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +8.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 49 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLC in plain words

XLC is an index equity fund tracking the Communication services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 23 positions, with the top ten at 76.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPHD or XLC?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPHD returned +8.6% and XLC returned −2.0%, so SPHD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPHD or XLC?
SPHD charges 0.30% a year and XLC charges 0.08%, so XLC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPHD and XLC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of SPHD and 100% of XLC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 9% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPHD against XLC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPHD against XLC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPHD-XLC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources