Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SOXQ vs VTI

Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SOXQ and VTI hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SOXQ and VTI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSOXQVTI
NVIDIA Corp.8.99%6.37%
Broadcom Inc.8.79%2.48%
Micron Technology, Inc.11.84%1.80%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.6.49%1.31%
Applied Materials, Inc.3.04%0.80%
Intel Corp.6.33%0.78%
Lam Research Corp.3.42%0.75%
KLA Corp.3.16%0.55%
Texas Instruments Inc.3.62%0.38%
Marvell Technology, Inc.6.32%0.37%
QUALCOMM Inc.4.44%0.27%
Analog Devices, Inc.2.93%0.27%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SOXQOnly in VTI
NXP Semiconductors N.V. 3.00%Apple Inc 5.88%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. L 2.81%Microsoft Corp 3.84%
ASML Holding N.V. 2.80%Amazon.com Inc 3.19%
ARM Holdings PLC 1.82%Alphabet Inc 2.90%
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. 1.64%Alphabet Inc 2.29%
Nova Ltd. 0.59%Meta Platforms Inc 1.71%
Tesla Inc 1.64%
Eli Lilly & Co 1.41%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SOXQ and VTI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
Where it sitsThemes deskCore fund
IssuerInvescoVanguard
What it isSemiconductorsUS total market
Total return, 1 year+107.9%+20.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+20.0%+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500+87.9 pts+0.0 pts
Expense ratio0.19%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50084.0%88.3%
Holdings303531

SOXQ in plain words

By weight, 84% of SOXQ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 81%. The top ten holdings are 63% of the fund across 30 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +107.9% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 87.9 pts. It sits 19.7% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

VTI in plain words

VTI is a index equity fund tracking US total market. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.0% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SOXQ or VTI?
In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SOXQ returned +107.9% and VTI returned +20.0%, so SOXQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SOXQ or VTI?
SOXQ charges 0.19% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SOXQ and VTI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of SOXQ and 88% of VTI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 17% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Are SOXQ and VTI the same kind of fund?
No. SOXQ is a thematic ETF and VTI is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SOXQ against VTI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SOXQ against VTI, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SOXQ-VTI.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources