Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
AIQ vs VTI
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AIQ and VTI hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | AIQ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| ALPHABET INC. | 2.72% | 2.90% |
| NVIDIA CORPORATION | 2.70% | 6.37% |
| BROADCOM INC. | 3.25% | 2.48% |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION | 2.36% | 3.84% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 5.77% | 1.80% |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. | 2.31% | 1.71% |
| TESLA, INC. | 2.29% | 1.64% |
| INTEL CORPORATION | 4.18% | 0.78% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. | 3.83% | 0.58% |
| NETFLIX, INC. | 2.43% | 0.42% |
| MARVELL TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 1.27% | 0.37% |
| INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORAT | 2.04% | 0.37% |
| Only in AIQ | Only in VTI |
|---|---|
| SK hynix Inc. 7.12% | Apple Inc 5.88% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 4.81% | Amazon.com Inc 3.19% |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 4.80% | Alphabet Inc 2.29% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 3.02% | Eli Lilly & Co 1.41% |
| APPLE INC. 2.97% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 1.31% |
| AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.73% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.25% |
| Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 1.84% | JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.12% |
| Tencent Holdings Limited 1.68% | Johnson & Johnson 0.85% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Themes desk | Core fund |
| Issuer | Global X | Vanguard |
| What it is | Artificial intelligence | US total market |
| Total return, 1 year | +42.9% | +20.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +20.0% | +20.0% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +22.9 pts | +0.0 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.68% | 0.03% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 64.8% | 88.3% |
| Holdings | 84 | 3531 |
AIQ in plain words
By weight, 65% of AIQ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 70%. The top ten holdings are 43% of the fund across 84 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +42.9% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 22.9 pts. It sits 8.3% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
VTI in plain words
VTI is a index equity fund tracking US total market. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.0% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AIQ or VTI?
- In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AIQ returned +42.9% and VTI returned +20.0%, so AIQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, AIQ or VTI?
- AIQ charges 0.68% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do AIQ and VTI overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 65% of AIQ and 88% of VTI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 21% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
- Are AIQ and VTI the same kind of fund?
- No. AIQ is a thematic ETF and VTI is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AIQ against VTI, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AIQ-VTI.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources