Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SOXQ vs VOO
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF and Vanguard 500 Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SOXQ and VOO hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SOXQ | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp. | 8.99% | 7.53% |
| Broadcom Inc. | 8.79% | 2.78% |
| Micron Technology, Inc. | 11.84% | 2.02% |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 6.49% | 1.47% |
| Intel Corp. | 6.33% | 1.03% |
| Applied Materials, Inc. | 3.04% | 0.89% |
| Lam Research Corp. | 3.42% | 0.84% |
| KLA Corp. | 3.16% | 0.61% |
| Texas Instruments Inc. | 3.62% | 0.42% |
| Marvell Technology, Inc. | 6.32% | 0.41% |
| QUALCOMM Inc. | 4.44% | 0.30% |
| Analog Devices, Inc. | 2.93% | 0.30% |
| Only in SOXQ | Only in VOO |
|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. L 2.81% | Apple Inc 6.61% |
| ASML Holding N.V. 2.80% | Microsoft Corp 4.31% |
| Astera Labs, Inc. 2.15% | Amazon.com Inc 3.63% |
| ARM Holdings PLC 1.82% | Alphabet Inc 3.26% |
| GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. 1.64% | Alphabet Inc 2.60% |
| Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. 1.51% | Meta Platforms Inc 1.92% |
| MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc 1.01% | Tesla Inc 1.84% |
| Entegris, Inc. 0.78% | Eli Lilly & Co 1.48% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | VOO Vanguard 500 Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Themes desk | Core fund |
| Issuer | Invesco | Vanguard |
| What it is | Semiconductors | S&P 500 |
| Total return, 1 year | +107.9% | +20.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +20.0% | +20.0% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +87.9 pts | +0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.19% | 0.03% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 84.0% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 30 | 506 |
SOXQ in plain words
By weight, 84% of SOXQ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 81%. The top ten holdings are 63% of the fund across 30 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +107.9% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 87.9 pts. It sits 19.7% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.
VOO in plain words
VOO is a index equity fund tracking S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.1% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 36.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SOXQ or VOO?
- In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SOXQ returned +107.9% and VOO returned +20.1%, so SOXQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SOXQ or VOO?
- SOXQ charges 0.19% a year and VOO charges 0.03%, so VOO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do SOXQ and VOO overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 84% of SOXQ and 100% of VOO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 19% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
- Are SOXQ and VOO the same kind of fund?
- No. SOXQ is a thematic ETF and VOO is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SOXQ against VOO, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SOXQ-VOO.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources