Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SLV vs VTEB: how they differ
SLV is a commodity fund and VTEB a bond index fund, and over the year SLV returned more, +53.8% against +0.2%.
iShares Silver Trust and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund.
| SLV iShares Silver Trust | VTEB Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | Silver | Tax-Exempt Bond |
| Total return, 1 year | +53.8% | +0.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +36.3 pts | −17.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% |
| Holdings | not filed | 10185 |
SLV in plain words
SLV is a commodity fund tracking the Silver. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +53.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. It sat 45.0% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VTEB in plain words
VTEB is a bond fund tracking the Tax-Exempt Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SLV or VTEB?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SLV returned +53.8% and VTEB returned +0.2%, so SLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SLV or VTEB?
- SLV charges 0.50% a year and VTEB charges 0.03%, so VTEB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SLV against VTEB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SLV-VTEB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources