Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
AGG vs VTEB: how they differ
AGG and VTEB are both bond index funds, and over the year VTEB returned more, +0.2% against −0.7%.
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund.
| AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | VTEB Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | US aggregate bonds | Tax-Exempt Bond |
| Total return, 1 year | −0.7% | +0.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −18.2 pts | −17.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Holdings | not filed | 10185 |
AGG in plain words
AGG is a bond fund tracking the US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.
VTEB in plain words
VTEB is a bond fund tracking the Tax-Exempt Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AGG or VTEB?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −0.7% and VTEB returned +0.2%, so VTEB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, AGG or VTEB?
- AGG charges 0.03% a year and VTEB charges 0.03%, so AGG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AGG against VTEB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AGG-VTEB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources