Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SKYY vs VTI

First Trust Cloud Computing ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SKYY and VTI hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SKYY and VTI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSKYYVTI
Microsoft Corporation3.62%3.84%
Amazon.com, Inc.3.12%3.19%
Alphabet Inc. (Class A)2.91%2.90%
Cisco Systems, Inc.1.97%0.58%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.0.64%0.39%
International Business Machines Corporat2.58%0.37%
Oracle Corporation2.30%0.35%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (Class A)0.63%0.26%
Arista Networks, Inc.3.97%0.25%
Applovin Corp. (Class A)0.85%0.20%
Dell Technologies Inc. (Class C)2.03%0.17%
Salesforce, Inc.2.21%0.17%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SKYYOnly in VTI
Shopify Inc. (Class A) 2.00%NVIDIA Corp 6.37%
Wix.com Ltd. 1.48%Apple Inc 5.88%
SAP SE (ADR) 1.29%Broadcom Inc 2.48%
Open Text Corporation 0.55%Alphabet Inc 2.29%
US Dollar 0.07%Micron Technology Inc 1.80%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.71%
Tesla Inc 1.64%
Eli Lilly & Co 1.41%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 4, 2026.

SKYY and VTI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SKYY
First Trust Cloud Computing ETF
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
Where it sitsThemes deskCore fund
IssuerFirst TrustVanguard
What it isCloud and softwareUS total market
Total return, 1 year+26.4%+20.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+20.0%+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500+6.5 pts+0.0 pts
Expense ratio0.60%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50038.4%88.3%
Holdings643531

SKYY in plain words

By weight, 38% of SKYY's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 33% of the fund across 64 positions, as filed for Sep 3, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +26.4% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 6.5 pts.

VTI in plain words

VTI is a index equity fund tracking US total market. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.0% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SKYY or VTI?
In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SKYY returned +26.4% and VTI returned +20.0%, so SKYY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SKYY or VTI?
SKYY charges 0.60% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SKYY and VTI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 38% of SKYY and 88% of VTI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Are SKYY and VTI the same kind of fund?
No. SKYY is a thematic ETF and VTI is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SKYY against VTI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SKYY against VTI, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SKYY-VTI.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources