Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SKYY vs VOO

First Trust Cloud Computing ETF and Vanguard 500 Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SKYY and VOO hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SKYY and VOO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSKYYVOO
Microsoft Corporation3.62%4.31%
Amazon.com, Inc.3.12%3.63%
Alphabet Inc. (Class A)2.91%3.26%
Cisco Systems, Inc.1.97%0.72%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.0.64%0.43%
International Business Machines Corporat2.58%0.41%
Oracle Corporation2.30%0.39%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (Class A)0.63%0.30%
Arista Networks, Inc.3.97%0.27%
Applovin Corp. (Class A)0.85%0.21%
Salesforce, Inc.2.21%0.20%
Dell Technologies Inc. (Class C)2.03%0.19%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SKYYOnly in VOO
Nutanix, Inc. (Class A) 4.27%NVIDIA Corp 7.53%
Everpure, Inc. (Class A) 4.09%Apple Inc 6.61%
MongoDB, Inc. 2.99%Broadcom Inc 2.78%
Atlassian Corporation (Class A) 2.88%Alphabet Inc 2.60%
GitLab Inc. (Class A) 2.62%Micron Technology Inc 2.02%
Cloudflare, Inc. (Class A) 2.51%Meta Platforms Inc 1.92%
DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. 2.35%Tesla Inc 1.84%
Workiva Inc. 2.28%Eli Lilly & Co 1.48%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 4, 2026.

SKYY and VOO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SKYY
First Trust Cloud Computing ETF
VOO
Vanguard 500 Index Fund
Where it sitsThemes deskCore fund
IssuerFirst TrustVanguard
What it isCloud and softwareS&P 500
Total return, 1 year+26.4%+20.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+20.0%+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500+6.5 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.60%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50038.4%100.0%
Holdings64506

SKYY in plain words

By weight, 38% of SKYY's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 33% of the fund across 64 positions, as filed for Sep 3, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +26.4% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 6.5 pts.

VOO in plain words

VOO is a index equity fund tracking S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.1% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 36.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SKYY or VOO?
In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SKYY returned +26.4% and VOO returned +20.1%, so SKYY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SKYY or VOO?
SKYY charges 0.60% a year and VOO charges 0.03%, so VOO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SKYY and VOO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 38% of SKYY and 100% of VOO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Are SKYY and VOO the same kind of fund?
No. SKYY is a thematic ETF and VOO is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SKYY against VOO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SKYY against VOO, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SKYY-VOO.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources