Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SDY vs VTV: how they differ

SDY and VTV hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and VTV returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF and Vanguard Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SDY and VTV hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SDY and VTV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSDYVTV
AbbVie Inc1.63%1.67%
Procter & Gamble Co/The1.26%1.28%
Chevron Corp1.28%1.18%
Coca-Cola Co/The1.26%1.05%
Johnson & Johnson1.00%2.30%
International Business Machines Corp1.27%0.99%
Exxon Mobil Corp0.93%2.13%
QUALCOMM Inc1.57%0.73%
PepsiCo Inc1.33%0.70%
NextEra Energy Inc1.08%0.65%
Analog Devices Inc0.61%0.73%
Verizon Communications Inc2.15%0.60%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SDYOnly in VTV
Medtronic PLC 1.30%Micron Technology Inc 4.89%
Evergy Inc 0.98%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.07%
Amcor PLC 0.93%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.96%
Fastenal Co 0.91%Cisco Systems Inc 1.57%
McDonald's Corp 0.89%UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.42%
Accenture PLC 0.88%Bank of America Corp 1.37%
Essex Property Trust Inc 0.87%Home Depot Inc/The 1.32%
Atmos Energy Corp 0.85%Merck & Co Inc 1.19%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

SDY and VTV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
VTV
Vanguard Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetVanguard
What it isSPDR S&P DividendUS value
Total return, 1 year+11.0%+22.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.5 pts+5.4 pts
Expense ratio0.35%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50084.6%98.6%
Holdings155308

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VTV in plain words

VTV is an index equity fund tracking the US value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 308 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SDY or VTV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SDY returned +11.0% and VTV returned +22.9%, so VTV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SDY or VTV?
SDY charges 0.35% a year and VTV charges 0.03%, so VTV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SDY and VTV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of SDY and 99% of VTV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 23% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SDY against VTV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SDY against VTV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SDY-VTV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources