Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SDY vs VO: how they differ

SDY and VO hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and VO returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SDY and VO hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SDY and VO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSDYVO
Cummins Inc0.69%0.95%
Target Corp1.55%0.57%
Realty Income Corp2.14%0.56%
Fastenal Co0.91%0.54%
Aflac Inc0.94%0.52%
L3Harris Technologies Inc0.52%0.53%
Nucor Corp0.59%0.49%
Xcel Energy Inc1.26%0.49%
Microchip Technology Inc1.32%0.48%
Cardinal Health Inc0.47%0.54%
Becton Dickinson & Co1.07%0.41%
Ameriprise Financial Inc0.60%0.40%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SDYOnly in VO
Verizon Communications Inc 2.15%Vertiv Holdings Co 1.23%
AbbVie Inc 1.63%Western Digital Corp 1.07%
QUALCOMM Inc 1.57%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.05%
Texas Instruments Inc 1.56%Quanta Services Inc 1.05%
Automatic Data Processing Inc 1.54%Howmet Aerospace Inc 1.04%
PepsiCo Inc 1.33%Datadog Inc 0.84%
Southern Co/The 1.33%Bloom Energy Corp 0.79%
Medtronic PLC 1.30%Constellation Energy Corp 0.78%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

SDY and VO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetVanguard
What it isSPDR S&P DividendMid-Cap
Total return, 1 year+11.0%+12.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.5 pts−5.5 pts
Expense ratio0.35%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50084.6%91.4%
Holdings155282

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VO in plain words

VO is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SDY or VO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SDY returned +11.0% and VO returned +12.0%, so VO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SDY or VO?
SDY charges 0.35% a year and VO charges 0.03%, so VO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SDY and VO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of SDY and 91% of VO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SDY against VO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SDY against VO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SDY-VO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources