Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SDY vs VBR: how they differ

SDY and VBR hold 11% of their weight in the same names, and VBR returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SDY and VBR hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SDY and VBR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSDYVBR
Atmos Energy Corp0.85%0.62%
CH Robinson Worldwide Inc0.65%0.45%
JB Hunt Transport Services Inc0.41%0.47%
Evergy Inc0.98%0.41%
Essex Property Trust Inc0.87%0.40%
Genuine Parts Co0.73%0.35%
Best Buy Co Inc0.69%0.33%
Carlisle Cos Inc0.56%0.32%
Stanley Black & Decker Inc0.66%0.31%
RPM International Inc0.64%0.30%
Globe Life Inc0.47%0.30%
Assurant Inc0.62%0.29%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SDYOnly in VBR
Verizon Communications Inc 2.15%Jabil Inc 0.87%
Realty Income Corp 2.14%NRG Energy Inc 0.66%
Kenvue Inc 1.76%Tapestry Inc 0.64%
Kimberly-Clark Corp 1.75%Williams-Sonoma Inc 0.59%
AbbVie Inc 1.63%Moderna Inc 0.54%
QUALCOMM Inc 1.57%Smurfit Westrock PLC 0.52%
Texas Instruments Inc 1.56%F5 Inc 0.50%
Target Corp 1.55%US Foods Holding Corp 0.48%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

SDY and VBR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetVanguard
What it isSPDR S&P DividendSmall-Cap Value
Total return, 1 year+11.0%+16.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.5 pts−1.2 pts
Expense ratio0.35%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50084.6%30.5%
Holdings155840

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VBR in plain words

VBR is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 30% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 840 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SDY or VBR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SDY returned +11.0% and VBR returned +16.3%, so VBR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SDY or VBR?
SDY charges 0.35% a year and VBR charges 0.05%, so VBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SDY and VBR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of SDY and 30% of VBR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 11% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SDY against VBR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SDY against VBR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SDY-VBR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources