Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SDY vs VB: how they differ

SDY and VB hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and VB returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SDY and VB hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SDY and VB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSDYVB
Atmos Energy Corp0.85%0.35%
JB Hunt Transport Services Inc0.41%0.27%
RB Global Inc0.60%0.26%
CH Robinson Worldwide Inc0.65%0.26%
Evergy Inc0.98%0.23%
Essex Property Trust Inc0.87%0.23%
Royal Gold Inc0.25%0.21%
Genuine Parts Co0.73%0.20%
Nordson Corp0.55%0.20%
Albemarle Corp0.26%0.19%
Best Buy Co Inc0.69%0.18%
Carlisle Cos Inc0.56%0.18%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SDYOnly in VB
Verizon Communications Inc 2.15%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55%
Realty Income Corp 2.14%Jabil Inc 0.49%
Kenvue Inc 1.76%REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46%
Kimberly-Clark Corp 1.75%Astera Labs Inc 0.45%
AbbVie Inc 1.63%Natera Inc 0.45%
QUALCOMM Inc 1.57%EMCOR Group Inc 0.45%
Texas Instruments Inc 1.56%Twilio Inc 0.38%
Target Corp 1.55%NRG Energy Inc 0.38%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

SDY and VB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetVanguard
What it isSPDR S&P DividendSmall-Cap
Total return, 1 year+11.0%+15.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.5 pts−2.3 pts
Expense ratio0.35%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50084.6%21.7%
Holdings1551311

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SDY or VB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SDY returned +11.0% and VB returned +15.2%, so VB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SDY or VB?
SDY charges 0.35% a year and VB charges 0.03%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SDY and VB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of SDY and 22% of VB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SDY against VB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SDY against VB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SDY-VB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources