Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SDY vs URTH: how they differ

SDY and URTH hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and URTH returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF and iShares MSCI World ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SDY and URTH hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SDY and URTH both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSDYURTH
Exxon Mobil Corp0.93%0.67%
Johnson & Johnson1.00%0.60%
Caterpillar Inc0.47%0.45%
AbbVie Inc1.63%0.42%
Chevron Corp1.28%0.38%
Procter & Gamble Co/The1.26%0.37%
Microsoft Corp0.36%3.50%
Coca-Cola Co/The1.26%0.35%
International Business Machines Corp1.27%0.30%
Texas Instruments Inc1.56%0.30%
QUALCOMM Inc1.57%0.29%
Walmart Inc0.29%0.56%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SDYOnly in URTH
Medtronic PLC 1.30%NVIDIA CORPORATION 5.64%
Amcor PLC 0.93%APPLE INC. 5.04%
Accenture PLC 0.88%AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.86%
Stanley Black & Decker Inc 0.66%ALPHABET INC. 2.43%
Assurant Inc 0.62%BROADCOM INC. 2.21%
J M Smucker Co/The 0.58%ALPHABET INC. 2.01%
Equity LifeStyle Properties Inc 0.58%META PLATFORMS, INC. 1.51%
Linde PLC 0.56%TESLA, INC. 1.35%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SDY and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetiShares
What it isSPDR S&P DividendMSCI World
Total return, 1 year+11.0%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.5 pts−0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.35%0.24%
Already in the S&P 50084.6%70.3%
Holdings1551322

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

URTH in plain words

URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1322 positions, with the top ten at 27.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SDY or URTH?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SDY returned +11.0% and URTH returned +17.4%, so URTH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SDY or URTH?
SDY charges 0.35% a year and URTH charges 0.24%, so URTH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SDY and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of SDY and 70% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 10% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SDY against URTH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SDY against URTH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SDY-URTH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources