Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SDY vs SPYG: how they differ
SDY and SPYG hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and SPYG returned more over the year.
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SDY and SPYG hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SDY | SPYG |
|---|---|---|
| Johnson & Johnson | 1.00% | 1.02% |
| AbbVie Inc | 1.63% | 0.58% |
| Caterpillar Inc | 0.47% | 1.38% |
| International Business Machines Corp | 1.27% | 0.39% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The | 1.26% | 0.37% |
| Microsoft Corp | 0.36% | 7.81% |
| McDonald's Corp | 0.89% | 0.24% |
| Cummins Inc | 0.69% | 0.19% |
| S&P Global Inc | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| General Dynamics Corp | 0.84% | 0.13% |
| Casey's General Stores Inc | 0.13% | 0.08% |
| Cincinnati Financial Corp | 1.11% | 0.05% |
| Only in SDY | Only in SPYG |
|---|---|
| Verizon Communications Inc 2.15% | NVIDIA Corp 13.66% |
| Realty Income Corp 2.14% | Apple Inc 5.99% |
| Kenvue Inc 1.76% | Alphabet Inc 5.91% |
| Kimberly-Clark Corp 1.75% | Broadcom Inc 5.04% |
| QUALCOMM Inc 1.57% | Alphabet Inc 4.71% |
| Texas Instruments Inc 1.56% | Micron Technology Inc 3.67% |
| Target Corp 1.55% | Meta Platforms Inc 3.49% |
| Automatic Data Processing Inc 1.54% | Amazon.com Inc 3.48% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| SDY State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF | SPYG State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | State Street | State Street |
| What it is | SPDR S&P Dividend | SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.0% | +17.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −6.5 pts | +0.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 84.6% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 155 | 147 |
SDY in plain words
SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SPYG in plain words
SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SDY or SPYG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SDY returned +11.0% and SPYG returned +17.9%, so SPYG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SDY or SPYG?
- SDY charges 0.35% a year and SPYG charges 0.04%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do SDY and SPYG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 85% of SDY and 100% of SPYG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SDY against SPYG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SDY-SPYG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources