Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHX vs VBK: how they differ

SCHX and VBK hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and SCHX returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHX and VBK hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHX and VBK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHXVBK
Astera Labs Inc0.07%1.05%
EMCOR Group Inc0.05%0.52%
EQT Corp0.05%0.23%
First Solar Inc0.05%0.34%
Natera Inc0.04%1.04%
Casey's General Stores Inc0.04%0.83%
Twilio Inc0.04%0.88%
AST SpaceMobile Inc0.04%0.35%
Curtiss-Wright Corp0.04%0.79%
IonQ Inc0.04%0.44%
Everpure Inc0.04%0.70%
Hubbell Inc0.04%0.20%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHXOnly in VBK
NVIDIA Corp 7.51%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.27%
Apple Inc 6.71%REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 1.07%
Microsoft Corp 4.89%FTAI Aviation Ltd 0.78%
Amazon.com Inc 3.87%nVent Electric PLC 0.77%
Alphabet Inc 3.24%ATI Inc 0.76%
Broadcom Inc 3.10%TechnipFMC PLC 0.74%
Alphabet Inc 2.58%MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings Inc 0.74%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.02%Sterling Infrastructure Inc 0.69%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SCHX and VBK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isU.S. Large-CapSmall-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year+16.8%+13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.7 pts−3.7 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50094.9%10.2%
Holdings748545

SCHX in plain words

SCHX is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 748 positions, with the top ten at 37.3%.

VBK in plain words

VBK is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 545 positions, with the top ten at 9.3%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHX or VBK?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHX returned +16.8% and VBK returned +13.8%, so SCHX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHX or VBK?
SCHX charges 0.03% a year and VBK charges 0.05%, so SCHX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHX and VBK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHX and 10% of VBK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHX against VBK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHX against VBK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHX-VBK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources