Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SCHH vs VTWO: how they differ
SCHH and VTWO hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and VTWO returned more over the year.
Schwab U.S. REIT ETF and Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SCHH and VTWO hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SCHH | VTWO |
|---|---|---|
| CareTrust REIT Inc | 0.65% | 0.27% |
| American Healthcare REIT Inc | 0.62% | 0.26% |
| Ryman Hospitality Properties Inc | 0.52% | 0.21% |
| Terreno Realty Corp | 0.49% | 0.20% |
| Macerich Co/The | 0.44% | 0.18% |
| Essential Properties Realty Trust Inc | 0.46% | 0.18% |
| Kite Realty Group Trust | 0.42% | 0.17% |
| Phillips Edison & Co Inc | 0.36% | 0.15% |
| Sabra Health Care REIT Inc | 0.36% | 0.15% |
| Outfront Media Inc | 0.33% | 0.14% |
| Tanger Factory Outlet Centers Inc | 0.29% | 0.12% |
| Independence Realty Trust Inc | 0.27% | 0.12% |
| Only in SCHH | Only in VTWO |
|---|---|
| Welltower Inc 9.64% | Bloom Energy Corp 1.83% |
| Prologis Inc 8.97% | Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.12% |
| Equinix Inc 4.89% | Sterling Infrastructure Inc 0.76% |
| Simon Property Group Inc 4.48% | Fabrinet 0.69% |
| Digital Realty Trust Inc 4.36% | Nextpower Inc 0.67% |
| American Tower Corp 4.35% | IonQ Inc 0.63% |
| Realty Income Corp 4.00% | Coeur Mining Inc 0.58% |
| Public Storage 3.41% | TTM Technologies Inc 0.52% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
| SCHH Schwab U.S. REIT ETF | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Schwab | Vanguard |
| What it is | US REIT | Russell 2000 |
| Total return, 1 year | +9.8% | +21.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −7.7 pts | +3.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 74.0% | 0.5% |
| Holdings | 117 | 1951 |
SCHH in plain words
SCHH is an index equity fund tracking the US REIT. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 74% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 117 positions, with the top ten at 49.8%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Jul 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VTWO in plain words
VTWO is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1951 positions, with the top ten at 7.8%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SCHH or VTWO?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHH returned +9.8% and VTWO returned +21.4%, so VTWO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SCHH or VTWO?
- SCHH charges 0.07% a year and VTWO charges 0.07%, so SCHH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do SCHH and VTWO overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 74% of SCHH and 0% of VTWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHH against VTWO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHH-VTWO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources