Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHH vs VTV: how they differ

SCHH and VTV hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and VTV returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. REIT ETF and Vanguard Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHH and VTV hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHH and VTV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHHVTV
Prologis Inc8.97%0.47%
American Tower Corp4.35%0.29%
Simon Property Group Inc4.48%0.26%
Digital Realty Trust Inc4.36%0.24%
Public Storage3.41%0.19%
Ventas Inc2.85%0.16%
Iron Mountain Inc2.69%0.13%
Crown Castle Inc2.83%0.12%
Extra Space Storage Inc2.18%0.12%
Realty Income Corp4.00%0.11%
VICI Properties Inc2.19%0.10%
AvalonBay Communities Inc1.84%0.10%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHHOnly in VTV
Welltower Inc 9.64%Micron Technology Inc 4.89%
Equinix Inc 4.89%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.07%
SBA Communications Corp 1.54%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.96%
Weyerhaeuser Co 1.25%Johnson & Johnson 2.30%
Essex Property Trust Inc 1.25%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.13%
Invitation Homes Inc 1.17%Walmart Inc 1.87%
WP Carey Inc 1.16%Caterpillar Inc 1.84%
Kimco Realty Corp 1.15%AbbVie Inc 1.67%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SCHH and VTV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHH
Schwab U.S. REIT ETF
VTV
Vanguard Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isUS REITUS value
Total return, 1 year+9.8%+22.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−7.7 pts+5.4 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50074.0%98.6%
Holdings117308

SCHH in plain words

SCHH is an index equity fund tracking the US REIT. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 74% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 117 positions, with the top ten at 49.8%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Jul 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VTV in plain words

VTV is an index equity fund tracking the US value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 308 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHH or VTV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHH returned +9.8% and VTV returned +22.9%, so VTV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHH or VTV?
SCHH charges 0.07% a year and VTV charges 0.03%, so VTV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHH and VTV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 74% of SCHH and 99% of VTV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHH against VTV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHH against VTV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHH-VTV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources