Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHH vs VT: how they differ

SCHH and VT hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and VT returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. REIT ETF and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHH and VT hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHH and VT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHHVT
Welltower Inc9.64%0.13%
Prologis Inc8.97%0.12%
Equinix Inc4.89%0.10%
American Tower Corp4.35%0.08%
Digital Realty Trust Inc4.36%0.06%
Simon Property Group Inc4.48%0.06%
Realty Income Corp4.00%0.05%
Public Storage3.41%0.04%
Ventas Inc2.85%0.04%
Crown Castle Inc2.83%0.04%
Iron Mountain Inc2.69%0.03%
Extra Space Storage Inc2.18%0.03%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHHOnly in VT
InvenTrust Properties Corp 0.18%NVIDIA Corp 4.22%
NETSTREIT Corp 0.14%Apple Inc 3.53%
Diversified Healthcare Trust 0.13%Microsoft Corp 2.73%
Smartstop Self Storage REIT Inc 0.12%Amazon.com Inc 2.29%
Sila Realty Trust Inc 0.12%Alphabet Inc 2.04%
RLJ Lodging Trust 0.10%Broadcom Inc 1.74%
UMH Properties Inc 0.09%Alphabet Inc 1.61%
Centerspace 0.08%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SCHH and VT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHH
Schwab U.S. REIT ETF
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isUS REITTotal World Stock
Total return, 1 year+9.8%+18.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−7.7 pts+1.4 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.06%
Already in the S&P 50074.0%55.2%
Holdings11710042

SCHH in plain words

SCHH is an index equity fund tracking the US REIT. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 74% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 117 positions, with the top ten at 49.8%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Jul 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VT in plain words

VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHH or VT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHH returned +9.8% and VT returned +18.9%, so VT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHH or VT?
SCHH charges 0.07% a year and VT charges 0.06%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHH and VT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 74% of SCHH and 55% of VT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHH against VT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHH against VT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHH-VT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources