Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHH vs VO: how they differ

SCHH and VO hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and VO returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. REIT ETF and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHH and VO hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHH and VO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHHVO
Simon Property Group Inc4.48%0.67%
Digital Realty Trust Inc4.36%0.61%
Realty Income Corp4.00%0.56%
Public Storage3.41%0.49%
Ventas Inc2.85%0.42%
Iron Mountain Inc2.69%0.35%
Crown Castle Inc2.83%0.32%
Extra Space Storage Inc2.18%0.30%
VICI Properties Inc2.19%0.26%
AvalonBay Communities Inc1.84%0.26%
Equity Residential1.60%0.25%
SBA Communications Corp1.54%0.18%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHHOnly in VO
Welltower Inc 9.64%Vertiv Holdings Co 1.23%
Prologis Inc 8.97%Western Digital Corp 1.07%
Equinix Inc 4.89%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.05%
American Tower Corp 4.35%Quanta Services Inc 1.05%
Weyerhaeuser Co 1.25%Howmet Aerospace Inc 1.04%
Essex Property Trust Inc 1.25%Cummins Inc 0.95%
Invitation Homes Inc 1.17%Datadog Inc 0.84%
WP Carey Inc 1.16%Bloom Energy Corp 0.79%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SCHH and VO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHH
Schwab U.S. REIT ETF
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isUS REITMid-Cap
Total return, 1 year+9.8%+12.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−7.7 pts−5.5 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50074.0%91.4%
Holdings117282

SCHH in plain words

SCHH is an index equity fund tracking the US REIT. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 74% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 117 positions, with the top ten at 49.8%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Jul 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VO in plain words

VO is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHH or VO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHH returned +9.8% and VO returned +12.0%, so VO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHH or VO?
SCHH charges 0.07% a year and VO charges 0.03%, so VO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHH and VO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 74% of SCHH and 91% of VO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHH against VO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHH against VO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHH-VO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources