Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHH vs VB: how they differ

SCHH and VB hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and VB returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. REIT ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHH and VB hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHH and VB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHHVB
Essex Property Trust Inc1.25%0.23%
Invitation Homes Inc1.17%0.22%
Weyerhaeuser Co1.25%0.21%
Kimco Realty Corp1.15%0.21%
Host Hotels & Resorts Inc1.04%0.20%
Mid-America Apartment Communities Inc1.07%0.20%
WP Carey Inc1.16%0.19%
Healthpeak Properties Inc0.94%0.18%
Sun Communities Inc1.02%0.18%
Regency Centers Corp0.90%0.18%
Omega Healthcare Investors Inc0.98%0.17%
Lamar Advertising Co0.94%0.17%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHHOnly in VB
Welltower Inc 9.64%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55%
Prologis Inc 8.97%Jabil Inc 0.49%
Equinix Inc 4.89%REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46%
Simon Property Group Inc 4.48%Astera Labs Inc 0.45%
Digital Realty Trust Inc 4.36%Natera Inc 0.45%
American Tower Corp 4.35%EMCOR Group Inc 0.45%
Realty Income Corp 4.00%Twilio Inc 0.38%
Public Storage 3.41%NRG Energy Inc 0.38%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SCHH and VB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHH
Schwab U.S. REIT ETF
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isUS REITSmall-Cap
Total return, 1 year+9.8%+15.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−7.7 pts−2.3 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50074.0%21.7%
Holdings1171311

SCHH in plain words

SCHH is an index equity fund tracking the US REIT. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 74% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 117 positions, with the top ten at 49.8%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Jul 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHH or VB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHH returned +9.8% and VB returned +15.2%, so VB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHH or VB?
SCHH charges 0.07% a year and VB charges 0.03%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHH and VB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 74% of SCHH and 22% of VB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHH against VB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHH against VB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHH-VB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources