Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SCHH vs SPYD: how they differ
SCHH and SPYD hold 22% of their weight in the same names, and SPYD returned more over the year.
Schwab U.S. REIT ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SCHH and SPYD hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SCHH | SPYD |
|---|---|---|
| Iron Mountain Inc | 2.69% | 1.62% |
| Simon Property Group Inc | 4.48% | 1.45% |
| Equity Residential | 1.60% | 1.33% |
| Public Storage | 3.41% | 1.33% |
| Essex Property Trust Inc | 1.25% | 1.36% |
| Realty Income Corp | 4.00% | 1.21% |
| Extra Space Storage Inc | 2.18% | 1.20% |
| Invitation Homes Inc | 1.17% | 1.32% |
| Kimco Realty Corp | 1.15% | 1.46% |
| VICI Properties Inc | 2.19% | 1.13% |
| American Tower Corp | 4.35% | 1.10% |
| Mid-America Apartment Communities Inc | 1.07% | 1.24% |
| Only in SCHH | Only in SPYD |
|---|---|
| Welltower Inc 9.64% | Franklin Resources Inc 1.57% |
| Prologis Inc 8.97% | CVS Health Corp 1.53% |
| Equinix Inc 4.89% | Edison International 1.48% |
| Digital Realty Trust Inc 4.36% | Target Corp 1.48% |
| Ventas Inc 2.85% | APA Corp 1.48% |
| AvalonBay Communities Inc 1.84% | Viatris Inc 1.46% |
| SBA Communications Corp 1.54% | EOG Resources Inc 1.44% |
| Weyerhaeuser Co 1.25% | Phillips 66 1.44% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| SCHH Schwab U.S. REIT ETF | SPYD State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Schwab | State Street |
| What it is | US REIT | SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend |
| Total return, 1 year | +9.8% | +12.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −7.7 pts | −4.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 74.0% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 117 | 78 |
SCHH in plain words
SCHH is an index equity fund tracking the US REIT. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 74% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 117 positions, with the top ten at 49.8%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Jul 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SPYD in plain words
SPYD is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 15.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SCHH or SPYD?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHH returned +9.8% and SPYD returned +12.9%, so SPYD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SCHH or SPYD?
- SCHH charges 0.07% a year and SPYD charges 0.07%, so SCHH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do SCHH and SPYD overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 74% of SCHH and 100% of SPYD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 22% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHH against SPYD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHH-SPYD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources