Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SCHG vs XRT: how they differ
SCHG and XRT hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and SCHG returned more over the year.
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SCHG and XRT hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SCHG | XRT |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon.com Inc | 5.68% | 1.35% |
| Costco Wholesale Corp | 1.48% | 1.29% |
| O'Reilly Automotive Inc | 0.26% | 1.38% |
| Carvana Co | 0.18% | 1.32% |
| AutoZone Inc | 0.17% | 1.39% |
| Casey's General Stores Inc | 0.10% | 1.17% |
| Ulta Beauty Inc | 0.08% | 1.30% |
| Coupang Inc | 0.08% | 1.55% |
| Only in SCHG | Only in XRT |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 11.02% | Groupon Inc 1.78% |
| Apple Inc 9.84% | RealReal Inc/The 1.75% |
| Microsoft Corp 7.18% | Bath & Body Works Inc 1.73% |
| Alphabet Inc 4.76% | Warby Parker Inc 1.64% |
| Broadcom Inc 4.55% | Upbound Group Inc 1.59% |
| Tesla Inc 3.92% | Maplebear Inc 1.55% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.78% | Revolve Group Inc 1.52% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.46% | Victoria's Secret & Co 1.52% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | XRT State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Schwab | State Street |
| What it is | U.S. Large-Cap Growth | SPDR S&P Retail |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.7% | −3.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −4.8 pts | −20.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.35% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 95.4% | 22.5% |
| Holdings | 193 | 75 |
SCHG in plain words
SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.
XRT in plain words
XRT is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Retail. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%. It sat 12.2% below its high of Nov 16, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SCHG or XRT?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHG returned +12.7% and XRT returned −3.0%, so SCHG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SCHG or XRT?
- SCHG charges 0.04% a year and XRT charges 0.35%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do SCHG and XRT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHG and 22% of XRT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHG against XRT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHG-XRT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources