Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SCHG vs XLY: how they differ
SCHG and XLY hold 12% of their weight in the same names, and SCHG returned more over the year.
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF and State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SCHG and XLY hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SCHG | XLY |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon.com Inc | 5.68% | 22.24% |
| Tesla Inc | 3.92% | 19.66% |
| Booking Holdings Inc | 0.47% | 3.44% |
| Marriott International Inc/MD | 0.29% | 2.02% |
| Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc | 0.27% | 1.87% |
| O'Reilly Automotive Inc | 0.26% | 1.90% |
| DoorDash Inc | 0.21% | 1.74% |
| Airbnb Inc | 0.20% | 1.49% |
| Carvana Co | 0.18% | 1.17% |
| AutoZone Inc | 0.17% | 1.31% |
| Carnival Corp Ltd | 0.13% | 0.92% |
| Ulta Beauty Inc | 0.08% | 0.49% |
| Only in SCHG | Only in XLY |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 11.02% | Home Depot Inc/The 5.83% |
| Apple Inc 9.84% | McDonald's Corp 4.16% |
| Microsoft Corp 7.18% | TJX Cos Inc/The 3.93% |
| Alphabet Inc 4.76% | Lowe's Cos Inc 3.08% |
| Broadcom Inc 4.55% | Starbucks Corp 2.90% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.78% | Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 1.97% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.46% | General Motors Co 1.73% |
| Eli Lilly & Co 3.06% | Ross Stores Inc 1.71% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | XLY State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Schwab | State Street |
| What it is | U.S. Large-Cap Growth | Consumer discretionary |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.7% | −4.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −4.8 pts | −21.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 95.4% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 193 | 47 |
SCHG in plain words
SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.
XLY in plain words
XLY is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer discretionary. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 47 positions, with the top ten at 69.2%. It sat 8.9% below its high of Jan 12, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SCHG or XLY?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHG returned +12.7% and XLY returned −4.1%, so SCHG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SCHG or XLY?
- SCHG charges 0.04% a year and XLY charges 0.08%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do SCHG and XLY overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHG and 100% of XLY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHG against XLY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHG-XLY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources