Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHG vs XLF: how they differ

SCHG and XLF hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and SCHG returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF and State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHG and XLF hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHG and XLF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHGXLF
Visa Inc1.92%7.51%
Mastercard Inc1.41%5.47%
Blackrock Inc0.53%1.83%
S&P Global Inc0.45%1.63%
Progressive Corp/The0.39%1.68%
Robinhood Markets Inc0.26%1.05%
Moody's Corp0.24%0.90%
KKR & Co Inc0.23%0.84%
Apollo Global Management Inc0.21%0.72%
MSCI Inc0.16%0.54%
Coinbase Global Inc0.15%0.43%
Block Inc0.14%0.54%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHGOnly in XLF
NVIDIA Corp 11.02%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 12.10%
Apple Inc 9.84%JPMorgan Chase & Co 11.57%
Microsoft Corp 7.18%Bank of America Corp 4.91%
Amazon.com Inc 5.68%Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 3.94%
Alphabet Inc 4.76%Wells Fargo & Co 3.34%
Broadcom Inc 4.55%Morgan Stanley 3.31%
Tesla Inc 3.92%Citigroup Inc 3.15%
Alphabet Inc 3.78%American Express Co 2.38%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SCHG and XLF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
XLF
State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabState Street
What it isU.S. Large-Cap GrowthFinancials
Total return, 1 year+12.7%+7.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.8 pts−9.9 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50095.4%100.0%
Holdings19376

SCHG in plain words

SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.

XLF in plain words

XLF is an index equity fund tracking the Financials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 57.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHG or XLF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHG returned +12.7% and XLF returned +7.6%, so SCHG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHG or XLF?
SCHG charges 0.04% a year and XLF charges 0.08%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHG and XLF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHG and 100% of XLF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHG against XLF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHG against XLF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHG-XLF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources