Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SCHG vs VPL: how they differ
SCHG and VPL hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VPL returned more over the year.
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF and Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SCHG and VPL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in SCHG | Only in VPL |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 11.02% | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 6.06% |
| Apple Inc 9.84% | SK hynix Inc 4.12% |
| Microsoft Corp 7.18% | Commonwealth Bank of Australia 1.80% |
| Amazon.com Inc 5.68% | Toyota Motor Corp 1.74% |
| Alphabet Inc 4.76% | Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 1.69% |
| Broadcom Inc 4.55% | BHP Group Ltd 1.66% |
| Tesla Inc 3.92% | Hitachi Ltd 1.18% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.78% | Advantest Corp 1.16% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | VPL Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Schwab | Vanguard |
| What it is | U.S. Large-Cap Growth | Pacific Stock |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.7% | +36.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −4.8 pts | +19.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 95.4% | 0.1% |
| Holdings | 193 | 2335 |
SCHG in plain words
SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.
VPL in plain words
VPL is an index equity fund tracking the Pacific Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +36.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2335 positions, with the top ten at 21.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SCHG or VPL?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHG returned +12.7% and VPL returned +36.9%, so VPL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SCHG or VPL?
- SCHG charges 0.04% a year and VPL charges 0.07%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do SCHG and VPL overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHG and 0% of VPL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHG against VPL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHG-VPL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources