Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHG vs VHT: how they differ

SCHG and VHT hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and VHT returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF and Vanguard Health Care Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHG and VHT hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHG and VHT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHGVHT
Eli Lilly & Co3.06%14.07%
UnitedHealth Group Inc1.20%5.46%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc0.65%2.93%
Intuitive Surgical Inc0.53%2.39%
Danaher Corp0.40%1.84%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc0.40%1.80%
McKesson Corp0.32%1.45%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc0.22%1.01%
IDEXX Laboratories Inc0.16%0.71%
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc0.14%0.63%
Waters Corp0.13%0.60%
Humana Inc0.13%0.58%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHGOnly in VHT
NVIDIA Corp 11.02%Johnson & Johnson 8.48%
Apple Inc 9.84%AbbVie Inc 6.10%
Microsoft Corp 7.18%Merck & Co Inc 4.67%
Amazon.com Inc 5.68%Amgen Inc 2.87%
Alphabet Inc 4.76%Gilead Sciences Inc 2.64%
Broadcom Inc 4.55%Abbott Laboratories 2.36%
Tesla Inc 3.92%Pfizer Inc 2.36%
Alphabet Inc 3.78%Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 1.84%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

SCHG and VHT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
VHT
Vanguard Health Care Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isU.S. Large-Cap GrowthHealth Care
Total return, 1 year+12.7%+21.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.8 pts+4.1 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50095.4%85.6%
Holdings193401

SCHG in plain words

SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.

VHT in plain words

VHT is an index equity fund tracking the Health Care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 401 positions, with the top ten at 52.0%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHG or VHT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHG returned +12.7% and VHT returned +21.6%, so VHT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHG or VHT?
SCHG charges 0.04% a year and VHT charges 0.09%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHG and VHT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHG and 86% of VHT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHG against VHT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHG against VHT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHG-VHT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources