Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHG vs VBK: how they differ

SCHG and VBK hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and VBK returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHG and VBK hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHG and VBK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHGVBK
Astera Labs Inc0.16%1.05%
EMCOR Group Inc0.13%0.52%
Natera Inc0.11%1.04%
Casey's General Stores Inc0.10%0.83%
Curtiss-Wright Corp0.10%0.79%
Carpenter Technology Corp0.08%0.82%
SoFi Technologies Inc0.08%0.65%
Insmed Inc0.08%0.33%
MasTec Inc0.08%0.74%
Texas Pacific Land Corp0.08%0.36%
Liberty Media Corp-Liberty Formula One0.08%0.57%
Affirm Holdings Inc0.07%0.61%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHGOnly in VBK
NVIDIA Corp 11.02%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.27%
Apple Inc 9.84%REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 1.07%
Microsoft Corp 7.18%Twilio Inc 0.88%
Amazon.com Inc 5.68%FTAI Aviation Ltd 0.78%
Alphabet Inc 4.76%nVent Electric PLC 0.77%
Broadcom Inc 4.55%Entegris Inc 0.77%
Tesla Inc 3.92%ATI Inc 0.76%
Alphabet Inc 3.78%TechnipFMC PLC 0.74%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SCHG and VBK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isU.S. Large-Cap GrowthSmall-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year+12.7%+13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.8 pts−3.7 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50095.4%10.2%
Holdings193545

SCHG in plain words

SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.

VBK in plain words

VBK is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 545 positions, with the top ten at 9.3%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHG or VBK?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHG returned +12.7% and VBK returned +13.8%, so VBK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHG or VBK?
SCHG charges 0.04% a year and VBK charges 0.05%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHG and VBK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHG and 10% of VBK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHG against VBK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHG against VBK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHG-VBK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources