Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHG vs SPMO: how they differ

SCHG and SPMO hold 31% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHG and SPMO hold 31% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHG and SPMO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHGSPMO
NVIDIA Corp11.02%8.46%
Alphabet Inc4.76%4.81%
Broadcom Inc4.55%7.58%
Alphabet Inc3.78%3.81%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc2.94%4.14%
Palantir Technologies Inc1.25%1.39%
General Electric Co1.19%1.63%
GE Vernova Inc0.91%1.33%
KLA Corp0.88%1.39%
Parker-Hannifin Corp0.37%0.39%
Quanta Services Inc0.37%0.48%
McKesson Corp0.32%0.46%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHGOnly in SPMO
Apple Inc 9.84%Micron Technology, Inc. 10.72%
Microsoft Corp 7.18%Johnson & Johnson 3.85%
Amazon.com Inc 5.68%Lam Research Corp. 3.54%
Tesla Inc 3.92%Intel Corp. 2.95%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.46%Exxon Mobil Corp. 2.78%
Eli Lilly & Co 3.06%Caterpillar Inc. 2.60%
Visa Inc 1.92%Sandisk Corp. 2.46%
Costco Wholesale Corp 1.48%Cisco Systems, Inc. 2.02%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

SCHG and SPMO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabInvesco
What it isU.S. Large-Cap GrowthS&P 500 Momentum
Total return, 1 year+12.7%+24.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.8 pts+7.0 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.13%
Already in the S&P 50095.4%100.0%
Holdings19399

SCHG in plain words

SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.

SPMO in plain words

SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHG or SPMO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHG returned +12.7% and SPMO returned +24.5%, so SPMO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHG or SPMO?
SCHG charges 0.04% a year and SPMO charges 0.13%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHG and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHG and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 31% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHG against SPMO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHG against SPMO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHG-SPMO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources