Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHG vs SDY: how they differ

SCHG and SDY hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and SCHG returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHG and SDY hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHG and SDY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHGSDY
Linde PLC0.81%0.56%
Microsoft Corp7.18%0.36%
S&P Global Inc0.45%0.35%
Sherwin-Williams Co/The0.24%0.43%
Costco Wholesale Corp1.48%0.20%
WW Grainger Inc0.19%0.40%
Roper Technologies Inc0.12%0.40%
Casey's General Stores Inc0.10%0.13%
West Pharmaceutical Services Inc0.08%0.19%
Texas Pacific Land Corp0.08%0.21%
Carlisle Cos Inc0.05%0.56%
FactSet Research Systems Inc0.03%0.37%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHGOnly in SDY
NVIDIA Corp 11.02%Verizon Communications Inc 2.15%
Apple Inc 9.84%Realty Income Corp 2.14%
Amazon.com Inc 5.68%Kenvue Inc 1.76%
Alphabet Inc 4.76%Kimberly-Clark Corp 1.75%
Broadcom Inc 4.55%AbbVie Inc 1.63%
Tesla Inc 3.92%QUALCOMM Inc 1.57%
Alphabet Inc 3.78%Texas Instruments Inc 1.56%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.46%Target Corp 1.55%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SCHG and SDY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabState Street
What it isU.S. Large-Cap GrowthSPDR S&P Dividend
Total return, 1 year+12.7%+11.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.8 pts−6.5 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50095.4%84.6%
Holdings193155

SCHG in plain words

SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHG or SDY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHG returned +12.7% and SDY returned +11.0%, so SCHG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHG or SDY?
SCHG charges 0.04% a year and SDY charges 0.35%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHG and SDY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHG and 85% of SDY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHG against SDY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHG against SDY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHG-SDY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources