Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHF vs VXUS: how they differ

SCHF and VXUS hold 51% of their weight in the same names, and SCHF returned more over the year.

Schwab International Equity ETF and Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHF and VXUS hold 51% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHF and VXUS both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHFVXUS
SK hynix Inc2.83%1.14%
HSBC Holdings PLC1.09%0.74%
AstraZeneca PLC0.94%0.67%
Shell PLC0.81%0.61%
Royal Bank of Canada0.91%0.59%
Siemens AG0.78%0.51%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia0.67%0.49%
Toyota Motor Corp0.68%0.48%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc0.70%0.47%
Toronto-Dominion Bank/The0.65%0.43%
Allianz SE0.57%0.41%
Schneider Electric SE0.58%0.41%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHFOnly in VXUS
ASML Holding NV 2.12%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.97%
Novartis AG 0.98%Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 1.67%
Nestle SA 0.88%ASML Holding NV 1.32%
SAP SE 0.63%Tencent Holdings Ltd 0.89%
ABB Ltd 0.56%Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 0.69%
LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE 0.48%Novartis AG 0.67%
Airbus SE 0.41%Nestle SA 0.61%
AIA Group Ltd 0.37%SAP SE 0.41%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SCHF and VXUS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isInternational EquityTotal International Stock
Total return, 1 year+25.4%+22.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.0 pts+4.8 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.05%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings14768775

SCHF in plain words

SCHF is an index equity fund tracking the International Equity. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +25.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1476 positions, with the top ten at 14.9%.

VXUS in plain words

VXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8775 positions, with the top ten at 12.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHF or VXUS?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHF returned +25.4% and VXUS returned +22.3%, so SCHF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHF or VXUS?
SCHF charges 0.03% a year and VXUS charges 0.05%, so SCHF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHF and VXUS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of SCHF and 0% of VXUS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 51% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHF against VXUS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHF against VXUS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHF-VXUS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources