Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SCHD vs SPHD: how they differ
SCHD and SPHD hold 20% of their weight in the same names, and SCHD returned more over the year.
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SCHD and SPHD hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SCHD | SPHD |
|---|---|---|
| Verizon Communications Inc | 3.66% | 3.49% |
| Altria Group Inc | 2.94% | 3.45% |
| Chevron Corp | 3.84% | 2.10% |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co | 2.94% | 2.08% |
| EOG Resources Inc | 1.82% | 1.99% |
| Comcast Corp | 2.25% | 1.60% |
| ONEOK Inc | 1.33% | 2.66% |
| Fifth Third Bancorp | 1.13% | 1.33% |
| Kimberly-Clark Corp | 0.82% | 2.09% |
| Paychex Inc | 0.79% | 1.46% |
| Regions Financial Corp | 0.61% | 1.59% |
| T Rowe Price Group Inc | 0.58% | 2.10% |
| Only in SCHD | Only in SPHD |
|---|---|
| QUALCOMM Inc 6.75% | Healthpeak Properties, Inc. 3.24% |
| Texas Instruments Inc 5.92% | Kraft Heinz Co. (The) 3.03% |
| UnitedHealth Group Inc 5.10% | Pfizer Inc. 2.99% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The 3.96% | Franklin Resources, Inc. 2.82% |
| Merck & Co Inc 3.87% | VICI Properties Inc. 2.68% |
| Procter & Gamble Co/The 3.55% | Kimco Realty Corp. 2.46% |
| ConocoPhillips 3.52% | Realty Income Corp. 2.43% |
| Amgen Inc 3.48% | Amcor PLC 2.41% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
| SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | SPHD Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Schwab | Invesco |
| What it is | US dividend | S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility |
| Total return, 1 year | +27.6% | +8.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +10.1 pts | −8.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.06% | 0.30% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 95.1% | 95.7% |
| Holdings | 99 | 49 |
SCHD in plain words
SCHD is an index equity fund tracking the US dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 43.7%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SPHD in plain words
SPHD is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +8.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 49 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SCHD or SPHD?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHD returned +27.6% and SPHD returned +8.6%, so SCHD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SCHD or SPHD?
- SCHD charges 0.06% a year and SPHD charges 0.30%, so SCHD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do SCHD and SPHD overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHD and 96% of SPHD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 20% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHD against SPHD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHD-SPHD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources