Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SCHB vs XRT: how they differ
SCHB and XRT are both equity index funds, and over the year SCHB returned more, +17.2% against −3.0%.
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF.
| SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | XRT State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Schwab | State Street |
| What it is | US broad market, book from ITOT | SPDR S&P Retail |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | −3.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.3 pts | −20.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.35% |
| Holdings | not filed | 75 |
SCHB in plain words
SCHB is an index equity fund tracking the US broad market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.
XRT in plain words
XRT is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Retail. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%. It sat 12.2% below its high of Nov 16, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SCHB or XRT?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHB returned +17.2% and XRT returned −3.0%, so SCHB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHB against XRT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHB-XRT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources