Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SCHB vs VYM: how they differ
SCHB and VYM are both equity index funds, and over the year they finished level, +17.2% against +17.6%.
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF and Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund.
| SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Schwab | Vanguard |
| What it is | US broad market, book from ITOT | US high dividend |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +17.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.3 pts | +0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.04% |
| Holdings | not filed | 608 |
SCHB in plain words
SCHB is an index equity fund tracking the US broad market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.
VYM in plain words
VYM is an index equity fund tracking the US high dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 25.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SCHB or VYM?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHB returned +17.2% and VYM returned +17.6%, so VYM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHB against VYM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHB-VYM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources