Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SCHB vs SPHQ: how they differ
SCHB and SPHQ are both equity index funds, and over the year they finished level, +17.2% against +17.4%.
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF.
| SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Schwab | Invesco |
| What it is | US broad market, book from ITOT | S&P 500 Quality |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +17.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.3 pts | −0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.15% |
| Holdings | not filed | 99 |
SCHB in plain words
SCHB is an index equity fund tracking the US broad market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.
SPHQ in plain words
SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SCHB or SPHQ?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHB returned +17.2% and SPHQ returned +17.4%, so SPHQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHB against SPHQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHB-SPHQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources