Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
RSP vs XRT: how they differ
RSP and XRT hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and RSP returned more over the year.
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, RSP and XRT hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | RSP | XRT |
|---|---|---|
| Carvana Co. | 0.25% | 1.32% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. | 0.24% | 1.35% |
| eBay Inc. | 0.22% | 1.42% |
| Casey's General Stores, Inc. | 0.21% | 1.17% |
| Target Corp. | 0.21% | 1.38% |
| Ross Stores, Inc. | 0.21% | 1.24% |
| Walmart Inc. | 0.21% | 1.27% |
| O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. | 0.20% | 1.38% |
| Costco Wholesale Corp. | 0.20% | 1.29% |
| AutoZone, Inc. | 0.19% | 1.39% |
| TJX Cos., Inc. (The) | 0.19% | 1.22% |
| Best Buy Co., Inc. | 0.18% | 1.36% |
| Only in RSP | Only in XRT |
|---|---|
| Intel Corp. 0.38% | Groupon Inc 1.78% |
| Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.34% | RealReal Inc/The 1.75% |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 0.33% | Bath & Body Works Inc 1.73% |
| ON Semiconductor Corp. 0.33% | Warby Parker Inc 1.64% |
| Sandisk Corp. 0.32% | Upbound Group Inc 1.59% |
| Western Digital Corp. 0.31% | Coupang Inc 1.55% |
| Ciena Corp. 0.30% | Maplebear Inc 1.55% |
| Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 0.29% | Revolve Group Inc 1.52% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | XRT State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Invesco | State Street |
| What it is | S&P 500 equal weight | SPDR S&P Retail |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.8% | −3.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −2.7 pts | −20.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.20% | 0.35% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 99.1% | 22.5% |
| Holdings | 503 | 75 |
RSP in plain words
RSP is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 503 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XRT in plain words
XRT is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Retail. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%. It sat 12.2% below its high of Nov 16, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, RSP or XRT?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RSP returned +14.8% and XRT returned −3.0%, so RSP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, RSP or XRT?
- RSP charges 0.20% a year and XRT charges 0.35%, so RSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do RSP and XRT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of RSP and 22% of XRT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, RSP against XRT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/RSP-XRT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources