Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

RSP vs SPMO: how they differ

RSP and SPMO hold 17% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned more over the year.

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, RSP and SPMO hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions RSP and SPMO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingRSPSPMO
Intel Corp.0.38%2.95%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC0.34%1.88%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.0.33%4.14%
Sandisk Corp.0.32%2.46%
Western Digital Corp.0.31%1.77%
Ciena Corp.0.30%0.63%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.0.29%0.32%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.0.25%0.47%
Quanta Services, Inc.0.25%0.48%
GE Vernova Inc.0.25%1.33%
Analog Devices, Inc.0.24%0.81%
Caterpillar Inc.0.24%2.60%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in RSPOnly in SPMO
ON Semiconductor Corp. 0.33%
Centene Corp. 0.29%
NXP Semiconductors N.V. 0.28%
Dell Technologies Inc. 0.27%
Microchip Technology Inc. 0.27%
Texas Instruments Inc. 0.27%
Humana Inc. 0.27%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. 0.26%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

RSP and SPMO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoInvesco
What it isS&P 500 equal weightS&P 500 Momentum
Total return, 1 year+14.8%+24.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.7 pts+7.0 pts
Expense ratio0.20%0.13%
Already in the S&P 50099.1%100.0%
Holdings50399

RSP in plain words

RSP is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 503 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPMO in plain words

SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RSP or SPMO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RSP returned +14.8% and SPMO returned +24.5%, so SPMO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, RSP or SPMO?
RSP charges 0.20% a year and SPMO charges 0.13%, so SPMO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do RSP and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of RSP and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 17% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

RSP against SPMO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, RSP against SPMO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/RSP-SPMO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources