Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
RSP vs SCHH: how they differ
RSP and SCHH hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and RSP returned more over the year.
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF and Schwab U.S. REIT ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, RSP and SCHH hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | RSP | SCHH |
|---|---|---|
| Iron Mountain Inc. | 0.23% | 2.69% |
| SBA Communications Corp. | 0.23% | 1.54% |
| Invitation Homes Inc. | 0.22% | 1.17% |
| BXP, Inc. | 0.22% | 0.63% |
| Digital Realty Trust, Inc. | 0.21% | 4.36% |
| Equinix, Inc. | 0.21% | 4.89% |
| Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | 0.21% | 1.04% |
| Equity Residential | 0.21% | 1.60% |
| Simon Property Group, Inc. | 0.21% | 4.48% |
| AvalonBay Communities, Inc. | 0.20% | 1.84% |
| Prologis, Inc. | 0.20% | 8.97% |
| Welltower Inc. | 0.20% | 9.64% |
| Only in RSP | Only in SCHH |
|---|---|
| Intel Corp. 0.38% | WP Carey Inc 1.16% |
| Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.34% | Sun Communities Inc 1.02% |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 0.33% | Omega Healthcare Investors Inc 0.98% |
| ON Semiconductor Corp. 0.33% | Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc 0.94% |
| Sandisk Corp. 0.32% | Lamar Advertising Co 0.94% |
| Western Digital Corp. 0.31% | Equity LifeStyle Properties Inc 0.85% |
| Ciena Corp. 0.30% | EastGroup Properties Inc 0.76% |
| Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 0.29% | American Homes 4 Rent 0.74% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | SCHH Schwab U.S. REIT ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Invesco | Schwab |
| What it is | S&P 500 equal weight | US REIT |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.8% | +9.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −2.7 pts | −7.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.20% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 99.1% | 74.0% |
| Holdings | 503 | 117 |
RSP in plain words
RSP is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 503 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SCHH in plain words
SCHH is an index equity fund tracking the US REIT. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 74% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 117 positions, with the top ten at 49.8%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Jul 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, RSP or SCHH?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RSP returned +14.8% and SCHH returned +9.8%, so RSP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, RSP or SCHH?
- RSP charges 0.20% a year and SCHH charges 0.07%, so SCHH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do RSP and SCHH overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of RSP and 74% of SCHH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, RSP against SCHH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/RSP-SCHH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources