Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

REMX vs SPHD: how they differ

Over the year REMX returned more, +21.9% against +8.6%, and SPHD charges 0.30% against 0.53%.

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, REMX and SPHD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in REMXOnly in SPHD
Xiamen Tungsten Co Ltd 7.28%Verizon Communications Inc. 3.49%
Albemarle Corp 7.24%Altria Group, Inc. 3.45%
China Northern Rare Earth Group High-Tec 7.06%Healthpeak Properties, Inc. 3.24%
PLS Group Ltd 6.84%Kraft Heinz Co. (The) 3.03%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd 6.80%Pfizer Inc. 2.99%
MP Materials Corp 6.20%Franklin Resources, Inc. 2.82%
Jinduicheng Molybdenum Co Ltd 5.94%VICI Properties Inc. 2.68%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA 4.92%ONEOK, Inc. 2.66%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

REMX and SPHD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
Where it sitsThematic ETFCore index fund
IssuerVanEckInvesco
What it isMiners and metalsS&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility
Total return, 1 year+21.9%+8.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.4 pts−8.9 pts
Expense ratio0.53%0.30%
Already in the S&P 5007.2%95.7%
Holdings3049

REMX in plain words

By weight, 7% of REMX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 30 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +21.9% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 4.4 pts. It sits 67.6% below its all-time high of Apr 11, 2011.

SPHD in plain words

SPHD is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +8.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 49 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, REMX or SPHD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, REMX returned +21.9% and SPHD returned +8.6%, so REMX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, REMX or SPHD?
REMX charges 0.53% a year and SPHD charges 0.30%, so SPHD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do REMX and SPHD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 7% of REMX and 96% of SPHD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Are REMX and SPHD the same kind of fund?
No. REMX is a thematic ETF and SPHD is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

REMX against SPHD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, REMX against SPHD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/REMX-SPHD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources