Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

RDVY vs XLY: how they differ

RDVY and XLY hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and RDVY returned more over the year.

First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF and State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, RDVY and XLY hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions RDVY and XLY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingRDVYXLY
ROSS STORES INC2.01%1.71%
BOOKING HOLDINGS INC1.18%3.44%
EBAY INC1.00%1.24%
EXPEDIA GROUP INC1.51%0.73%
WILLIAMS SONOMA INC2.12%0.68%
PULTEGROUP INC1.33%0.65%
RALPH LAUREN CORP1.01%0.39%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in RDVYOnly in XLY
APPLIED MATERIALS INC 4.69%Amazon.com Inc 22.24%
LAM RESEARCH CORP 4.42%Tesla Inc 19.66%
KLA CORP 4.14%Home Depot Inc/The 5.83%
GE VERNOVA INC 2.80%McDonald's Corp 4.16%
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP (THE) 2.15%TJX Cos Inc/The 3.93%
GE AEROSPACE 2.13%Lowe's Cos Inc 3.08%
ALPHABET INC 2.12%Starbucks Corp 2.90%
ALLSTATE CORP (THE) 2.01%Marriott International Inc/MD 2.02%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

RDVY and XLY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
XLY
State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFirst TrustState Street
What it isFirst Rising Dividend AchieversConsumer discretionary
Total return, 1 year+22.0%−4.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.5 pts−21.6 pts
Expense ratio0.47%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50094.4%100.0%
Holdings7147

RDVY in plain words

RDVY is an index equity fund tracking the First Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 71 positions, with the top ten at 28.6%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLY in plain words

XLY is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer discretionary. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 47 positions, with the top ten at 69.2%. It sat 8.9% below its high of Jan 12, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RDVY or XLY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RDVY returned +22.0% and XLY returned −4.1%, so RDVY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, RDVY or XLY?
RDVY charges 0.47% a year and XLY charges 0.08%, so XLY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do RDVY and XLY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of RDVY and 100% of XLY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

RDVY against XLY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, RDVY against XLY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/RDVY-XLY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources