Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
RDVY vs VYM: how they differ
RDVY and VYM hold 11% of their weight in the same names, and RDVY returned more over the year.
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF and Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, RDVY and VYM hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | RDVY | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY | 1.91% | 3.36% |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP | 1.96% | 1.45% |
| WELLS FARGO & COMPANY | 0.97% | 1.07% |
| ABBOTT LABORATORIES | 0.58% | 0.66% |
| CITIGROUP INC | 0.54% | 0.89% |
| PROGRESSIVE CORP (THE) | 0.77% | 0.49% |
| BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP (THE) | 2.15% | 0.39% |
| US BANCORP | 1.56% | 0.37% |
| PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP INC (THE) | 1.55% | 0.36% |
| AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC | 1.63% | 0.36% |
| ELEVANCE HEALTH INC | 0.54% | 0.34% |
| BAKER HUGHES COMPANY | 1.77% | 0.29% |
| Only in RDVY | Only in VYM |
|---|---|
| APPLIED MATERIALS INC 4.69% | Broadcom Inc 8.07% |
| LAM RESEARCH CORP 4.42% | Exxon Mobil Corp 2.73% |
| KLA CORP 4.14% | Johnson & Johnson 2.31% |
| GE VERNOVA INC 2.80% | Caterpillar Inc 1.73% |
| GE AEROSPACE 2.13% | AbbVie Inc 1.57% |
| ALPHABET INC 2.12% | Cisco Systems Inc 1.52% |
| ROSS STORES INC 2.01% | Chevron Corp 1.51% |
| CHUBB LTD (SWITZERLAND) 1.97% | Procter & Gamble Co/The 1.45% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | First Trust | Vanguard |
| What it is | First Rising Dividend Achievers | US high dividend |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.0% | +17.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +4.5 pts | +0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 94.4% | 92.2% |
| Holdings | 71 | 608 |
RDVY in plain words
RDVY is an index equity fund tracking the First Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 71 positions, with the top ten at 28.6%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VYM in plain words
VYM is an index equity fund tracking the US high dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 25.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, RDVY or VYM?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RDVY returned +22.0% and VYM returned +17.6%, so RDVY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, RDVY or VYM?
- RDVY charges 0.47% a year and VYM charges 0.04%, so VYM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do RDVY and VYM overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 94% of RDVY and 92% of VYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 11% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, RDVY against VYM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/RDVY-VYM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources