Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

RDVY vs VIG: how they differ

RDVY and VIG hold 19% of their weight in the same names, and RDVY returned more over the year.

First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, RDVY and VIG hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions RDVY and VIG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingRDVYVIG
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY1.91%3.61%
VISA INC1.82%2.34%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP1.73%2.04%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP1.96%1.58%
LAM RESEARCH CORP4.42%1.46%
MICROSOFT CORP1.45%3.99%
APPLE INC1.44%4.10%
MASTERCARD INC1.19%1.86%
KLA CORP4.14%1.04%
ABBOTT LABORATORIES0.58%0.72%
AMPHENOL CORP0.54%0.82%
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP (THE)2.15%0.42%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in RDVYOnly in VIG
APPLIED MATERIALS INC 4.69%Broadcom Inc 5.21%
GE VERNOVA INC 2.80%Eli Lilly & Co 3.36%
GE AEROSPACE 2.13%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.92%
ALPHABET INC 2.12%Walmart Inc 2.62%
ROSS STORES INC 2.01%Johnson & Johnson 2.51%
CHUBB LTD (SWITZERLAND) 1.97%Caterpillar Inc 1.88%
MUELLER INDUSTRIES INC 1.93%AbbVie Inc 1.69%
NVIDIA CORP 1.91%Cisco Systems Inc 1.64%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

RDVY and VIG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFirst TrustVanguard
What it isFirst Rising Dividend AchieversDividend growth
Total return, 1 year+22.0%+12.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.5 pts−5.1 pts
Expense ratio0.47%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50094.4%95.7%
Holdings71332

RDVY in plain words

RDVY is an index equity fund tracking the First Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 71 positions, with the top ten at 28.6%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VIG in plain words

VIG is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 332 positions, with the top ten at 32.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RDVY or VIG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RDVY returned +22.0% and VIG returned +12.4%, so RDVY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, RDVY or VIG?
RDVY charges 0.47% a year and VIG charges 0.04%, so VIG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do RDVY and VIG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of RDVY and 96% of VIG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 19% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

RDVY against VIG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, RDVY against VIG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/RDVY-VIG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources