Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
RDVY vs SPMO: how they differ
RDVY and SPMO hold 20% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned more over the year.
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, RDVY and SPMO hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | RDVY | SPMO |
|---|---|---|
| LAM RESEARCH CORP | 4.42% | 3.54% |
| ALPHABET INC | 2.12% | 4.81% |
| NVIDIA CORP | 1.91% | 8.46% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 1.83% | 10.72% |
| APPLIED MATERIALS INC | 4.69% | 1.77% |
| GE AEROSPACE | 2.13% | 1.63% |
| KLA CORP | 4.14% | 1.39% |
| GE VERNOVA INC | 2.80% | 1.33% |
| WESTERN DIGITAL CORP | 0.59% | 1.77% |
| CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (THE) | 0.95% | 0.55% |
| CITIGROUP INC | 0.54% | 0.97% |
| AMPHENOL CORP | 0.54% | 1.30% |
| Only in RDVY | Only in SPMO |
|---|---|
| WILLIAMS SONOMA INC 2.12% | Broadcom Inc. 7.58% |
| ROSS STORES INC 2.01% | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.14% |
| ALLSTATE CORP (THE) 2.01% | Johnson & Johnson 3.85% |
| TRAVELERS COMPANIES INC (THE) 2.00% | Alphabet Inc. 3.81% |
| SNAP-ON INC 2.00% | Intel Corp. 2.95% |
| CHUBB LTD (SWITZERLAND) 1.97% | Exxon Mobil Corp. 2.78% |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP 1.96% | Caterpillar Inc. 2.60% |
| MUELLER INDUSTRIES INC 1.93% | Sandisk Corp. 2.46% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | First Trust | Invesco |
| What it is | First Rising Dividend Achievers | S&P 500 Momentum |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.0% | +24.5% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +4.5 pts | +7.0 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.13% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 94.4% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 71 | 99 |
RDVY in plain words
RDVY is an index equity fund tracking the First Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 71 positions, with the top ten at 28.6%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SPMO in plain words
SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, RDVY or SPMO?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RDVY returned +22.0% and SPMO returned +24.5%, so SPMO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, RDVY or SPMO?
- RDVY charges 0.47% a year and SPMO charges 0.13%, so SPMO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do RDVY and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 94% of RDVY and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 20% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, RDVY against SPMO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/RDVY-SPMO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources