Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

RDVY vs SDY: how they differ

RDVY and SDY hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and RDVY returned more over the year.

First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, RDVY and SDY hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions RDVY and SDY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingRDVYSDY
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC1.63%1.54%
CINCINNATI FINANCIAL CORP1.55%1.11%
AFLAC INC0.97%0.94%
TRAVELERS COMPANIES INC (THE)2.00%0.69%
AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL INC1.23%0.60%
ABBOTT LABORATORIES0.58%1.00%
DOVER CORP0.52%0.42%
MICROSOFT CORP1.45%0.36%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP1.73%0.20%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in RDVYOnly in SDY
APPLIED MATERIALS INC 4.69%Verizon Communications Inc 2.15%
LAM RESEARCH CORP 4.42%Realty Income Corp 2.14%
KLA CORP 4.14%Kenvue Inc 1.76%
GE VERNOVA INC 2.80%Kimberly-Clark Corp 1.75%
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP (THE) 2.15%AbbVie Inc 1.63%
GE AEROSPACE 2.13%QUALCOMM Inc 1.57%
ALPHABET INC 2.12%Texas Instruments Inc 1.56%
WILLIAMS SONOMA INC 2.12%Target Corp 1.55%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

RDVY and SDY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFirst TrustState Street
What it isFirst Rising Dividend AchieversSPDR S&P Dividend
Total return, 1 year+22.0%+11.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.5 pts−6.5 pts
Expense ratio0.47%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50094.4%84.6%
Holdings71155

RDVY in plain words

RDVY is an index equity fund tracking the First Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 71 positions, with the top ten at 28.6%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RDVY or SDY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RDVY returned +22.0% and SDY returned +11.0%, so RDVY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, RDVY or SDY?
RDVY charges 0.47% a year and SDY charges 0.35%, so SDY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do RDVY and SDY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of RDVY and 85% of SDY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

RDVY against SDY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, RDVY against SDY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/RDVY-SDY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources