Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QUAL vs SPHD: how they differ

QUAL and SPHD hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and QUAL returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QUAL and SPHD hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QUAL and SPHD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQUALSPHD
PUBLIC STORAGE.0.25%2.08%
PAYCHEX, INC.0.22%1.46%
VICI PROPERTIES INC.0.14%2.68%
T. ROWE PRICE GROUP, INC.0.09%2.10%
OMNICOM GROUP INC.0.05%1.43%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QUALOnly in SPHD
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.52%Verizon Communications Inc. 3.49%
APPLE INC. 6.28%Altria Group, Inc. 3.45%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.05%Healthpeak Properties, Inc. 3.24%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 3.50%Kraft Heinz Co. (The) 3.03%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 3.23%Pfizer Inc. 2.99%
THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. 3.19%Franklin Resources, Inc. 2.82%
VISA INC. 3.09%ONEOK, Inc. 2.66%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 2.92%Kimco Realty Corp. 2.46%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

QUAL and SPHD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesInvesco
What it isMSCI USA Quality FactorS&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility
Total return, 1 year+16.0%+8.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−1.5 pts−8.9 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.30%
Already in the S&P 50098.9%95.7%
Holdings12149

QUAL in plain words

QUAL is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 121 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPHD in plain words

SPHD is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +8.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 49 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QUAL or SPHD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QUAL returned +16.0% and SPHD returned +8.6%, so QUAL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QUAL or SPHD?
QUAL charges 0.15% a year and SPHD charges 0.30%, so QUAL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QUAL and SPHD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of QUAL and 96% of SPHD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QUAL against SPHD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QUAL against SPHD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/QUAL-SPHD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources