Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QQQM vs VHT: how they differ

QQQM and VHT hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and QQQM returned more over the year.

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF and Vanguard Health Care Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QQQM and VHT hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QQQM and VHT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQQQMVHT
Amgen Inc.0.80%2.87%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.0.73%2.64%
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.0.66%2.39%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc.0.50%1.80%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.0.28%1.01%
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.0.20%0.71%
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.0.18%0.63%
DexCom, Inc.0.12%0.46%
GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.0.12%0.45%
Insmed Inc.0.10%0.36%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QQQMOnly in VHT
NVIDIA Corp. 8.16%Eli Lilly & Co 14.07%
Apple Inc. 7.29%Johnson & Johnson 8.48%
Microsoft Corp. 5.32%AbbVie Inc 6.10%
Micron Technology, Inc. 4.80%UnitedHealth Group Inc 5.46%
Amazon.com, Inc. 4.62%Merck & Co Inc 4.67%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 3.70%Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 2.93%
Alphabet Inc. 3.52%Abbott Laboratories 2.36%
Tesla, Inc. 3.46%Pfizer Inc 2.36%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

QQQM and VHT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
VHT
Vanguard Health Care Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoVanguard
What it isNasdaq-100Health Care
Total return, 1 year+23.0%+21.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.5 pts+4.1 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%85.6%
Holdings101401

QQQM in plain words

QQQM is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 47.5%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VHT in plain words

VHT is an index equity fund tracking the Health Care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 401 positions, with the top ten at 52.0%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QQQM or VHT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQM returned +23.0% and VHT returned +21.6%, so QQQM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QQQM or VHT?
QQQM charges 0.15% a year and VHT charges 0.09%, so VHT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QQQM and VHT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of QQQM and 86% of VHT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QQQM against VHT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQM against VHT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/QQQM-VHT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources